15 AI apps shipped · 200,000+ users · 466 developers on the same foundation · a reply either way in 2 days
Still describing your AI product to people instead of sending them a link?
Have the first real version built with you — and open a live URL in 4–8 weeks
On the same foundation 466 developers already ship on, by the person who built it. A link you can open every week, and the repo is in your GitHub organisation from commit one.
200K+
Users across our products
Not demos. Products that take money.
4–8 wks
Idea to launch
Because ~70% of it is already written.
100%
Code ownership
Your GitHub org, from commit one.
Every one of these is already wired in
OpenAI
Anthropic
Google
Replicate
ElevenLabs
Groq
MistralNo pitch deck · no discovery phase · no retainer
Tell me what you want built and I will tell you straight whether we should.
Two minutes of writing, no payment and no call booked yet. Inside 2 working days you get either a time to talk or a straight no with the reason — and if it is a no, what I would do instead.
Takes two minutes · no payment · a reply either way
These are ours, not a portfolio of other people’s work.
We are operators before we are a studio. Every one of these runs in production, takes money, and was built on the same foundation your product would be.
$ git clone anotherwrapper-premium
$ pnpm bootstrap
$ pnpm dev
$ ▋
AI Boilerplate
AnotherWrapper
The foundation everything below is built on
Sold since 2024. The developer count on this page is its customers.
SaaS Platform
Genviral
AI content studio — generation, scheduling and analytics in one place
Live, takes money, runs on the same rails.
B2B SaaS
Prospy
Lead intelligence for people who sell to founders
Built on the same foundation, start to finish.
And these were built by other people on the same foundation, without us in the room.
MakeForm.ai
Repurpost
LawBandit
ImagenMIA
PantryAI
TarotRead.ai
Fifteen AI apps, more than 200,000 users, and a foundation 466 other developers paid for and build on. When we say weeks rather than months, the reason is arithmetic — most of what your build needs is already written and already running somewhere that takes money.
Takes two minutes · a reply either way in 2 working days
What developers say about the foundation your product runs on
These are about AnotherWrapper, the codebase — not about a build we delivered. It is the part of your project that already exists, so it is the part you can check before you talk to anyone.
“You've turned 3 months of work into 3 weeks man. Worth every penny.”
“I launched my AI writing assistant in a weekend instead of 6 weeks. Got my first paying customer within 3 days.”
First paying customer in 3 days
“Tried a couple different boilerplates but AnotherWrapper is super polished and the unified dashboard feature sold me on it.”
FarezEx-AWS / Warner Bros, 8yr in tech“Just launched our MVP! I am a law school student, made an app for my classmates and I to get through using AnotherWrapper!”
Launched lawbandit.com
“I have finished my MVP. Definitely wouldn't have pulled it off without the demo applications which gave me a kickstart.”
Launched repurpost.io
JonathanFounder, Repurpost.io“Thank you for making this. You don't know how life changing it is going to be.”
Sahil SanganiDigital Marketer466 developers took this foundation and built the thing themselves. BuildFound exists for the founders who would rather have the product than the process.
Which one are you?
No payment · no call booked yet · a reply either way
Fekri
15 AI apps shipped · 200,000+ users
Why this exists
First, let me tell you about the app I killed.
I still think it was a good idea. I never found out, because I spent six weeks on everything except the idea.
Not building it. Wiring it.
- Auth. Then auth again, differently, when I added Google sign-in
- A payment page, and a webhook that had been failing silently for four days before I noticed
- Session logic my agent had already rewritten twice, rewritten a third time
- Finding out at 1am that one user could open another user’s files by changing a number in the URL
Week six, the thing I actually wanted to make was still three paragraphs in a notes file. So I killed it. Six weeks gone, and the only part I had finished was the part every app already has.
Why this takes weeks
A month later I started something else, and recognised the code I was typing.
I had written it before. On the last app. And the one before that.
So I went back through all fifteen and counted. Roughly 70% of every new app was me rebuilding the last one — the same auth, the same billing, the same provider switching, the same upload pipeline, typed again from scratch.
That 70% is the whole reason a build here is measured in weeks. Nobody is working faster than anyone else. We are starting at week four of a six-week project, on code that is already carrying real users somewhere else, and spending the time on the 30% that is actually your product.
A studio that starts from an empty folder has to bill you for that 70% every time. That is not a difference in talent. It is a difference in where the first line of code lands.
Here are the 4 things you actually walk away with.
A live URL, in your hands, every week
Not a status update and not a screen recording. A link you open on your own phone with nobody on the call. If you cannot open it, it does not exist yet.
The repo in your GitHub organisation from commit one
Your org, your hosting, your keys, from the first day rather than the final invoice. A contract you would have to enforce is not ownership.
The same foundation, not a fresh empty folder
Auth, billing across three providers, seven model SDKs behind one interface, RAG and uploads are already written and already in production. That is the whole reason this takes weeks.
A codebase you can keep building on afterwards
Documented, typed, with the rules file your agent reads before it touches anything — so the version after ours is something you or your next hire can actually ship.
How a build runs
- Week 1Auth, billing and your data model. Live.
- Week 2The thing that makes it yours. Live.
- Week 3Real content, real users, real errors.
- Week 4Your domain. Your Stripe. Your launch.
Takes two minutes · no payment · a reply either way in 2 working days
The uncomfortable part
Most builds do not fail on the code.
They fail on scope, and then on the four months of silence that scope bought.
Somebody describes twelve features, everyone nods, a number gets agreed, and the first thing anyone can actually open is a demo in month four — by which point it is too late to find out that only two of the twelve mattered. Nobody lied. The shape of the project made the mistake unfindable until the money was gone.
So there are two rules here, and they exist to make that impossible.
- The first call is mostly me arguing you down to the smallest thing that would prove someone wants it — which is usually a fraction of what you came in describing
- There is a live URL in your hands every week, on your own phone, with nobody on the call — so if it is going wrong you find out in week two, not month four
- The repo sits in your GitHub organisation from commit one, with your hosting and your keys, so walking away costs you nothing you have already paid for
None of those are generous. They are just what it looks like when a studio has no interest in a project that should have been killed in week two.
Four steps. None of them is a status meeting.
We agree what the first real version is
Most of what people want built does not need to exist yet. The first call is mostly me arguing you down to the smallest thing that would prove someone wants it.
It gets built on the foundation, not from zero
Auth, payments, the model layer and the credit system are already done and already in production elsewhere. That is why this takes weeks rather than a hiring plan.
You get a live URL every week
Every week there is a link, and every week it does more than it did last week. You are never waiting on a reveal.
You keep it, and you can keep going
The repo was yours the whole time. At the end you have the code, the docs and the rules file — so the next feature does not require us.
You are not buying hours. You are buying a thing that exists.
Before you fill anything in
This is not for everyone, and that is on purpose.
We run 2 builds at a time, which means saying no often. Here is exactly how that decision gets made, so you can make it yourself before you spend two minutes on the form.
We should talk if
- You have a specific product in mind, not a plan to explore AI
- There is one person who can make the decision, and it is you
- There is some signal already — customers, a waitlist, revenue, or a manual process someone is doing by hand today
- You want to own the code and keep building on it afterwards
We should not
- You are collecting quotes to find the cheapest one
- Equity instead of cash
- You want a fixed number before anyone has scoped anything
- There is no clear user and no clear problem yet
And if you would rather build it yourself, that is genuinely the right answer more often than a studio will tell you.
The same foundation, on your own, for $249 →You probably have a question or two
These are the ones I get every week. If yours is not here, email me and I will answer it straight.
So what is the catch?
There is one, and it is that we will probably say no. We run 2 builds at a time and most applications are a no — usually because there is no clear user yet, or because what is being described is three products wearing a coat.
The second one is that this page has no price on it and I am not going to put one here. What it costs depends on what it is, and a number printed on a page before anyone has scoped anything is either too high for half the people reading it or a bait number that gets walked back on the call. You get a real figure, in writing, before you commit to anything — and if you would rather not have that conversation at all, the foundation is $249 and you can have it in sixty seconds.
What is not a catch: the repo is yours from commit one, there is no retainer, there is no minimum term, and nothing on this page auto-renews because there is nothing on this page to subscribe to.
Why apply now rather than next quarter
2 builds at a time, because there are 2 of us on it.
That is the whole scarcity story on this page. No countdown, no seats remaining, no price that rises after this batch. When both slots are running, the next start date moves — and applying is how you find out which of those is true this week.
The cost of waiting is not the fee.
It is another quarter of the product existing only as a description. The thing you are describing to people is either worth building or it is not, and the fastest honest way to find out is to put a URL in front of someone and watch what they do.
The application
Tell me what you want built
No price on this page on purpose. What it costs depends on what it is, and neither of us knows that yet. Six questions, two minutes, and I will tell you straight whether we are a fit and what I would do first — then you can grab a time if you would rather not wait for the email.
No payment · a reply either way in 2 working days
P.S. If you scrolled straight here — I do that too — here is the whole thing. You tell me what you want built. If it is a fit, we agree the smallest version worth shipping, build it on the foundation AnotherWrapper customers already run in production, and hand you a live URL every week. The repo is in your GitHub organisation from commit one.
No price on this page on purpose, no payment to apply, and no call in your calendar until we both want one. Inside 2 working days you get a time to talk or a straight no with the reason — and if it is a no, what I would do instead.
And if the honest answer is that you want to build it yourself, that is the better outcome and it costs $249. Go and take the foundation — BuildFound will still be here when you hit the part you would rather not do twice.
— Fekri
Would rather build it yourself? The same foundation, $249 once
Want to see what runs on it first? Eight finished apps are live at app.anotherwrapper.com
Rather talk to a person than fill in a form? [email protected]